Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jonathan Ray's avatar

argument from factory farming:

An omnipotent benevolent god would shout at us from the clouds like the Monty Python movies, saying "stop that factory farming shit right now, assholes!". We don't observe this, therefore he doesn't exist.

Expand full comment
Anlam Kuyusu's avatar

Most of these arguments are of the form.

1/ I can't explain/account for/justify X (where X can be motion, physical reality [!!!], morality, causation, psychophysical harmony, consciousness etc)

2/ Therefore, perfect God.

Even if I grant you premise 1/, the conclusion doesn't follow.

Such arguments haven't done well historically - with the best example being evolution explaining humans as opposed to creation.

Reading these sorts of things in the 21st century from the Greatest Undergraduate Student In Philosophy in the World, I'm having even more respect for Spinoza. You can disagree with him but at least, he honestly tried to come up with an objective conception of a god and wasn't just a slave of his time's prejudices.

For example, this is from a D- tier argument:

<<By regress, the first thing can’t be made of parts, because it would need something else to bind it together. Thus, there must be something without parts, which is argued to be God>>.

We can't explain how parts bind together -> therefore God.

Expand full comment
147 more comments...

No posts