Oct 2, 2023·edited Oct 2, 2023Liked by Bentham's Bulldog
I honestly don't know why Bogardus continues to subject himself to online debate. I can't imagine it's doing anything other than giving him clinical depression and a splitting headache.
(Also, Richard Carrier is the Kent Hovind of atheism.)
Pallmann is a moral skeptic who doesn't endorse moral realism, but also doesn't affirm moral antirealism, so wouldn't technically be a moral antirealist.
I honestly don't know why Bogardus continues to subject himself to online debate. I can't imagine it's doing anything other than giving him clinical depression and a splitting headache.
(Also, Richard Carrier is the Kent Hovind of atheism.)
Pallmann is a moral skeptic who doesn't endorse moral realism, but also doesn't affirm moral antirealism, so wouldn't technically be a moral antirealist.