> Thus, if an action is good, there should be that action
But the action is not good, because it violates the deontological constraint. I don’t see any defense of the implicit premise that an action is good if and only if it makes the world “better” from some impossible impartial perspective perspective.
> Thus, if an action is good, there should be that action
But the action is not good, because it violates the deontological constraint. I don’t see any defense of the implicit premise that an action is good if and only if it makes the world “better” from some impossible impartial perspective perspective.