Those are decent arguments against replacability being "bad", but it's not really an argument against replacing people being contrary to what is *right* (at least that's the case for most of the points that you gave). Note how in the quote by Knutsson, they talk about rightness, not goodness.
Obviously you, as a consequentialist, believe that The Good and The Right are equivalent, but to assume that would obviously be question-begging in this context...
Those are decent arguments against replacability being "bad", but it's not really an argument against replacing people being contrary to what is *right* (at least that's the case for most of the points that you gave). Note how in the quote by Knutsson, they talk about rightness, not goodness.
Obviously you, as a consequentialist, believe that The Good and The Right are equivalent, but to assume that would obviously be question-begging in this context...