This is certainly something I can agree with. Are you familiar with experimental philosophy? It's been around for about 20 years and while its proponents have a variety of aspirations, at least part of the goal is to empirically evaluate topics typically studied by philosophers.
Point for “common sense” morality in that most ordinary people believe in it, I suppose?
These sort of arguments are tricky. I would think that they strongly count against logical positivism. People don’t really believe that anymore from what I understand.
This is certainly something I can agree with. Are you familiar with experimental philosophy? It's been around for about 20 years and while its proponents have a variety of aspirations, at least part of the goal is to empirically evaluate topics typically studied by philosophers.
Point for “common sense” morality in that most ordinary people believe in it, I suppose?
These sort of arguments are tricky. I would think that they strongly count against logical positivism. People don’t really believe that anymore from what I understand.