Lmk if I’m misunderstanding you here, but it seems like your first argument doesn’t hold up so much. You claim that physicists have to posit all the complicated fundamental particles and their interactions while religious people only have to posit a god. This seems not true- as physicists have experimentally proven the existence of these particles, the religious people have to posit both the existence of these particles AND god! Lmk if I’m being stupid about this
Many-worlds/multiverse explains the last argument, the most plausible interpretation of qm.
There is one fundamental thing, put simply, space.
Morality, beyond language tricks, needs no grounding but itself, read Moore. DCT is antirealist, unless you’re a minimalist, which means morality might as well be a house of cards.
where are the disads, t-shells, and plan texts
Best of luck! Look forward to watching
Is there any way to watch the debate after the livestream is over?
Lmk if I’m misunderstanding you here, but it seems like your first argument doesn’t hold up so much. You claim that physicists have to posit all the complicated fundamental particles and their interactions while religious people only have to posit a god. This seems not true- as physicists have experimentally proven the existence of these particles, the religious people have to posit both the existence of these particles AND god! Lmk if I’m being stupid about this
Yes, but where are your STOCK issues?
Many-worlds/multiverse explains the last argument, the most plausible interpretation of qm.
There is one fundamental thing, put simply, space.
Morality, beyond language tricks, needs no grounding but itself, read Moore. DCT is antirealist, unless you’re a minimalist, which means morality might as well be a house of cards.
Please post the debate if possible, betting that God and Adelstein took the W here!
Best of luck!