> The moral “law,” just like mathematical laws, requires no lawgiver.
Someone had to come up with the axioms of math. And the justification for those at bottom is purely instrumental: Having axioms that seem to always work is pretty darn convenient.
> because the moral law is necessary, true in all possible worlds, and is fully uncaused, much like the mathematical facts.
This is just an assertion. Everything is just an assertion. Nothing is true! Woe is truth.
> The moral “law,” just like mathematical laws, requires no lawgiver.
Someone had to come up with the axioms of math. And the justification for those at bottom is purely instrumental: Having axioms that seem to always work is pretty darn convenient.
> because the moral law is necessary, true in all possible worlds, and is fully uncaused, much like the mathematical facts.
This is just an assertion. Everything is just an assertion. Nothing is true! Woe is truth.
Thanks for the Post.