The Martian example is excellent. Another useful feature of it is that is that it presents the scenario as normalized, something expected to happen every once in a while. This neuters the "Dr. Frankenstein's ego is so big he thinks he can single-mindedly change the way things have always been!" aspect of anti-Transplant intuitions.
Yes, I agree. Now I'd imagine utilitarians would still have the intuition that you should do it and non-utilitarians wouldn't. Still, it doesn't play on misleading intuitions and, when it doesn't, it's no longer seen as a good counterexample.
A stellar piece. However, in the words of one M. Hijab, "Contradiction! CONTRADICTION!" Expect my crushing response in a finite number of business days.
The Martian example is excellent. Another useful feature of it is that is that it presents the scenario as normalized, something expected to happen every once in a while. This neuters the "Dr. Frankenstein's ego is so big he thinks he can single-mindedly change the way things have always been!" aspect of anti-Transplant intuitions.
Yes, I agree. Now I'd imagine utilitarians would still have the intuition that you should do it and non-utilitarians wouldn't. Still, it doesn't play on misleading intuitions and, when it doesn't, it's no longer seen as a good counterexample.
Do you imagine that the division in responses would be pretty much the same as for the original Trolley?
No.
A stellar piece. However, in the words of one M. Hijab, "Contradiction! CONTRADICTION!" Expect my crushing response in a finite number of business days.