I legitimately feel like Richard underestimates how different moral systems can be. Many people would say that, e.g., if the child is of their enemies or something, it's preferable for the child to be struck by lightning because it weakens their enemies. (Of course, it's not the kind of deontologists you usually see now.)
I legitimately feel like Richard underestimates how different moral systems can be. Many people would say that, e.g., if the child is of their enemies or something, it's preferable for the child to be struck by lightning because it weakens their enemies. (Of course, it's not the kind of deontologists you usually see now.)
If you had to pick the best virtue ethicist, who would it be?