8 Comments

The clarity and urgency with which you advocate for farmed animals really earns you the title of Bentham’s Bulldog. From a long time vegan, keep up the good work

Expand full comment

But wait... I have it on the good authority of several YouTube vegan advocates that utilitarians are all weak-willed apologists who want slightly bigger cages.

Expand full comment

Are there good estimates for how much suffering is caused per burger? "Complicity in grave evil" may be a strong reason for deontologists / common-sense morality, but as a consequentialist I'm more interested in the marginal effect. I gather well-targeted donations make a vastly greater difference, in expectation, than personal dietary choices, so it seems a little odd when utilitarians (like Peter Singer & yourself) focus so much more on the latter. I would also guess it's easier to convince omnivores to donate more to effective animal charities than to convince them to become vegan. But I could be wrong about that.

> "But in order to avoid flagrant hypocrisy, to be consistent one must cease their own wrongdoing before expressing outrage over other’s wrongdoings."

Given that significant wrongdoing (viz. insufficient beneficence) is completely universal, I worry that anti-hypocrisy principles would result in no-one ever being allowed to mention others' bad behavior. But outrage over the violation of particular established good norms could still be a good thing, even if there are other (not yet socially "established") good candidate norms that we unfortunately continue to violate. It's worth working to establish those new good norms; but that's different from advocating for mere "consistency", which could just as well be achieved through moral "leveling down" (and ceasing to enforce the old established good norms).

Expand full comment

Yes. Every bite of chicken results in about 8 hours of factory farming. I don't remember exactly where I saw that number, though I remember it was reliable. Tomasik also has good numbers. https://reducing-suffering.org/how-much-direct-suffering-is-caused-by-various-animal-foods/

I think there's a big difference between insufficient benevolence and doing nothing--not even offsetting--in the face of grave evil.

Expand full comment

Well, yes, I do think of my personal veganism as primarily important because of the role it plays in my cultural influence. If Peter Singer somehow managed to eat a chicken every week in perfect secrecy, that badness would be a drop in the sea of good he's done, and he would still be a far greater net positive figure than you, me or Matthew. But it's not so easy to do. The prima facie badness of hypocrisy mostly lies in the degree to which it enervates the advocacy of the good.

Expand full comment

Any thoughts on animal welfare in Europe? The law as written seems far better than the US, but I have no idea how that looks in practice

Expand full comment

Hey, unsure how to best contact you, so I'm just commenting on this post to note that if you want to get in touch, I'm using a different number to the one I was previously on. Email me at samueljnglover@gmail.com and I'll send you the number (or we can just communicate via email).

Expand full comment

It's quite easy to speak for a group which cannot speak for itself.

Expand full comment