Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dominic Mekky's avatar

One practical point for people calling or emailing reps: tailor the framing to the office you’re contacting.

If your representative is already sympathetic to animal welfare, lead with animal welfare. But if your representative is Republican, skeptical of animal-rights politics, or likely to dismiss this as a single-issue activist concern, lead with the human and institutional problems.

Things like federal preemption, states’ rights, food safety, livestock disease prevention, animal importation rules, public health, and the danger of using the Farm Bill to override state agricultural standards.

Mention the animal-welfare consequences, but limit them to one paragraph, and increase the chance of getting the real animal-welfare win by presenting it as a “bonus” nested inside concerns Republican politicians are more likely to care about, e.g. Washington overriding state authority, weakening livestock disease-prevention rules, or handing one industry a special federal carveout.

Lead with those concerns. Most voters can see instantly that extreme confinement is cruel and unnecessary, but Republican staff may keep reading if the first frame is state authority, public health, and special-interest federal preemption.

Increase expected value by leading with the frame they are most likely to take seriously.

MIMIR_MAGNVS's avatar

The appropriately named SOB act

16 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?