Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Benjamin Tettü's avatar

Great article! One suggestion: instead of saying 'you shouldn’t cause animals extreme suffering for comparatively minor personal benefit', you might say 'you shouldn’t cause animals extreme harm for comparatively minor personal benefit.' That way, the argument doesn’t make it sound like suffering is the only relevant issue. It also covers things like sexual abuse, premature killing, and baby separation—points that many people find especially compelling.

Framing it as 'harm' also broadens the appeal beyond utilitarian reasoning, making the case more persuasive to deontologists and others who don’t frame morality purely in terms of suffering.

David Schneider-Joseph's avatar

This is well argued, thank you.

There is one common reason for eating animal products, however, that I don’t think is addressed, and isn’t really about slightly increasing the consumer’s pleasure but is about the fact that many people are more functional and productive with animal products in their diet, and it can be challenging to construct a diet lacking them which allows one to maintain this function.

I know there are many resources and guides for vegetarians and vegans to select substitute foods, but do you know of any that you think are particularly rational, helpful, and comprehensive?

18 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?