Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Greco's avatar

There are usages of the fact/opinion distinction that I think are pretty sensible. In defamation law, you need to make a false statement of fact to defame someone. You can defend yourself against a charge of defamation by arguing that what you said was true, but also by arguing that it was an expression of opinion rather than a statement of fact.

It's hard to nail down just how this works, but verification is definitely a big part of the story.

Here's a way to put it as a challenge. Do you think we shouldn't punish people for falsely saying other people have sex with children? Or do you think we should punish people for falsely calling other people assholes? If you think the status quo is fine--yes, punish people for calling people pedophiles, but don't punish people for calling people assholes--then you will probably end up recreating something a lot like the fact opinion distinction in justifying that distinction.

Expand full comment
JG's avatar
Jun 17Edited

Who is the hypothetical student here, who knows what “denotative language” and “objective evidence” are, but needs some help understanding the words “fact” and “opinion”?

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts