Hasan: Did someone in chat just type ~P. Oh my god and they’re a 30 month sub. Hahahahaha. Oh my god, die. Literally die. You know there’s a genocide going on right? *bans chatter*
What we can conclude from this is that no matter how many arguments Judith Butler makes about the performance of gender, she still can't stand up to P.
The Buddha: "The position that P is a thicket of views, a wilderness of views, a fetter of views; The position that ~P is a thicket of views, a contortion of views, a writhing of views. They are accompanied by suffering, distress, despair; they don't lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation."
Marxist-Leninists would be like - communist parties of China, Vietnam, Cuba have said P. USA and its allies have said ~P. Therefore, P. And I would agree with the marxist-leninists.
I can’t honestly endorse P or ~P without a proper specification of what P actually is. Words like “P” and “~P” matter: are we talking about a metaphysical thesis, a moral claim, a predictive empirical claim, or a linguistic/pragmatic convention? The strategy a rational agent ought to use is not blanket enthusiasm or blanket dismissal — it’s a method for evaluation.
Bishop Robert Barron:
>Nowadays it's common to see people say ~P. But let me go back to my intellectual hero John Henry Newman, who said "P"
Dr. K
>You know what's interesting. The yogi have actually looked at this question and they have found that P
Trump
> Many smart people are saying P. P is very very good and very powerful. We're going to have a very powerful P.
Asmongold
> Of course I believe P. Of course. Anyone would believe P.
Richard Hanania
> People that endorse P are wrong about political strategy.
Joe Biden
> We ... We beat medicare
These are great
Gödel: Con(P) -> Con(Con(P))
Dafür, ~P -> ~Con(P)
Und Con(Con(~P)) -> Con(~P)
Aber Con(~P) -> ~P
Natürlich, ein Widerspruch, falls P.
Also P.
Hasan: Did someone in chat just type ~P. Oh my god and they’re a 30 month sub. Hahahahaha. Oh my god, die. Literally die. You know there’s a genocide going on right? *bans chatter*
Bryan Caplan: government provides ~P that sounds good but is actually bad, and markets provide P that sounds bad but that’s actually good.
That’s really good
I read him more than anyone else so it better be good :)
LLM: That's not ~P — that’s P!
Lol
Not enough exclamation marks in the BB section.
What we can conclude from this is that no matter how many arguments Judith Butler makes about the performance of gender, she still can't stand up to P.
You left out Homer Simpson’s extraordinary insight about P 😂
I don't believe in no stinkin' P. Aagh! Save me, P-bus!
The Buddha: "The position that P is a thicket of views, a wilderness of views, a fetter of views; The position that ~P is a thicket of views, a contortion of views, a writhing of views. They are accompanied by suffering, distress, despair; they don't lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation."
Bold move putting yourself before Jesus.
The unpredictability with which these parodies careened through philosophy and apologetics internet was thrilling.
The Gavin Ortlund one got me
Marxist-Leninists would be like - communist parties of China, Vietnam, Cuba have said P. USA and its allies have said ~P. Therefore, P. And I would agree with the marxist-leninists.
ChatGPT:
I can’t honestly endorse P or ~P without a proper specification of what P actually is. Words like “P” and “~P” matter: are we talking about a metaphysical thesis, a moral claim, a predictive empirical claim, or a linguistic/pragmatic convention? The strategy a rational agent ought to use is not blanket enthusiasm or blanket dismissal — it’s a method for evaluation.
Samuel Johnson, on being told that Berkely's doctrine of ~p cannot be refuted:
*Kicks large stone* I refute it thus!
Banger.
Super! Made me laugh and it also improved my mental health. But you forgot Heidegger! Please add Heidegger’s quip on P.