Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Smith's avatar

Since this is an essay that might prove persuasive to future readers, I'd like to suggest a couple of minor edits to strengthen its rhetorical impact. I hope this is taken in the spirit intended, because I am very much in agreement with your underlying arguments on this front.

First, "gravitas" should really be "gravity" (or perhaps "enormity") to better capture the shade of your intended meaning in context. In conventional usage, "gravitas" refers more often to something more like the seriousness of an individual's manner or disposition (or the solemnity of a situation meriting respect). Word connotations are subject to change, I understand, but I halt at this unconventional usage, and it's easily revised.

Second, your closing paragraph currently reads: "We justify this cruelty by saying that our victims are inhuman. Yet when we do these things, it is we who become inhuman." I think this would be rhetorically stronger and more accurate if it were changed to read: "We justify this cruelty by saying that our victims are not human. Yet when we do these things, it is we who become inhuman." The reason is that the concept of "inhuman" implies "inhumanity," a term which comes preloaded with a pejorative weight that doesn't capture the ordinary sense of how people think of animals in order to rationalize their mistreatment and slaughter. There might be a better way to stick the landing by rephrasing it some other way, but I do think the use of "inhuman" in the first sentence grates against common usage and apprehension.

Jiatao Liang's avatar

By happenstance I read this one right after the post entitled "Most Arguments For Nature Clearly Prove Too Much" and I'm struck by a juxtaposition of these two. The alternative for these animals isn't a paradise, it's the Brutal Forest. Or at best, non-existence.

But if we accept non-existence as a clear improvement over either the Torture Factory or the Brutal Forest, is the correct course of action to scorch the earth and kill all animals now so there are no future suffering animals?

How do you reconcile these without spiraling into nihilism?

I started reading this blog a couple days ago, so if this was addressed in any other entries, I would be happy to be pointed there!

35 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?